Of the 2,223 formulas we looked at, only 134 met our standard of approval — about 6 percent overall. With so many choices on the market, it’s as important as ever to read labels and make informed decisions.
Ingredients matter most, so we started by eliminating formulas with ingredients we determined to be unhealthy, unsafe, or unfavorable.
It was important that each formula have a meat protein listed first — we removed 194 dog food formulas based on this criteria.
We next removed 578 additional formulas that had corn, soy, wheat, grain, or flour in any part of the ingredient list. Overall, this eliminated 772 formulas, taking us from 2,223 to 1,447.
Next, we took out all formulas containing beet pulp or sugar, eliminating 146 more and further reducing the number from 1,447 to 1,301.
Formulas that contained by-products and sauces led to 44 additional cuts, narrowing our choices from 1,301 to 1,257.
The 1,257 dog food formulas left did not have any ingredients we wouldn’t feed our own dogs. This was too large a number, however, so our next step was to review the brands themselves and return to formulas later.
Brands and Recalls
The original 2,223 dog food formulas we analyzed comprised 115 brands. But after reducing the number of formulas to 1,257, the number of brands dropped to 93.
Why
2,089 Dog Food Formulas Didn't Make the Cut
We
removed products:
We
reviewed:- where the first ingredient is not a meat of any kind
- containing corn, soy, wheat, grain, or flour
- containing beet pulp or sugar
- that contained by-products or sauces
- brands for recalls, ingredient sources, history, and customer satisfaction
- the remaining formulas based on the best ratio of protein, fat, and carbs, as well as the source of protein
Formulas
and Ingredients
Ingredients matter most, so we started by eliminating formulas with ingredients we determined to be unhealthy, unsafe, or unfavorable.
It was important that each formula have a meat protein listed first — we removed 194 dog food formulas based on this criteria.
We next removed 578 additional formulas that had corn, soy, wheat, grain, or flour in any part of the ingredient list. Overall, this eliminated 772 formulas, taking us from 2,223 to 1,447.
Next, we took out all formulas containing beet pulp or sugar, eliminating 146 more and further reducing the number from 1,447 to 1,301.
Formulas that contained by-products and sauces led to 44 additional cuts, narrowing our choices from 1,301 to 1,257.
The 1,257 dog food formulas left did not have any ingredients we wouldn’t feed our own dogs. This was too large a number, however, so our next step was to review the brands themselves and return to formulas later.
Brands and Recalls
The original 2,223 dog food formulas we analyzed comprised 115 brands. But after reducing the number of formulas to 1,257, the number of brands dropped to 93.
Brands
That Were Cut Because of Their Ingredients:
- Alpo
- Cesar
- Chicken Soup
- Eukanuba
- Fruitables
- GRAVY TRAIN®
- HI-TOR
- Hill’s Prescription Diet
- Hill’s Science Diet
- Iams Veterinary Formula
- KAL KAN®
- Nummy Tum-Tum
- Nutro
- Nutro Ultra
- Pedigree®
- Purina Pro Plan Veterinary Diets
- Royal Canin
- NRG
- Breeder’s Choice
- Natural Planet
- Now Fresh
- Nutro Natural
- Indigo
- Pet Naturals of Vermont
- Himalayan Dog Chew
Of the 93 brands left, we went straight to their recall history to look for anymajor recalls, any significant controversies, and unusually high numbers of customer complaints and reports.
Next, we took out brands that had been sold to large companies and, as a result, may be changing or have changed their formulas in a manner that compromises integrity.
Next, we took out brands that had been sold to large companies and, as a result, may be changing or have changed their formulas in a manner that compromises integrity.
Just as in human food, often, acquisitions and changes in ownership can lead to changes in formulas and manufacturing processes. In dog food, that can mean dramatically different ingredients that pet owners may not even notice.
For this reason, we eliminated dog food brands that had recently been acquired by large companies like Procter & Gamble (P&G), because we couldn’t guarantee that the data we had on them, or the ingredients listed, were up-to-date and reliable.
We also removed anything that is manufactured in countries that don’t have strong food-quality regulations, that were known to include lesser-quality ingredients, or do not have enough available information:
List of "Premium" Dog Food Brands:
Against the Grain: Not enough information
For this reason, we eliminated dog food brands that had recently been acquired by large companies like Procter & Gamble (P&G), because we couldn’t guarantee that the data we had on them, or the ingredients listed, were up-to-date and reliable.
We also removed anything that is manufactured in countries that don’t have strong food-quality regulations, that were known to include lesser-quality ingredients, or do not have enough available information:
List of "Premium" Dog Food Brands:
Artemis: Manufactured by Diamond
Canidae: Many negative customer reviews, manufactured by Diamond Canine
Caviar: Not enough information
Dave’s Pet Food: Not enough information
Dogswell: Some ingredients come from ChinaEvanger’s: Many consumer complaints and false labeling
EVO: Sold to P&G and also lost a class-action suit over false labeling
Farmina: Not enough information
Go!: Lesser-quality ingredients and issues with upset stomachs
Great Life: Mediocre reviews and not enough information
Holistic Select: Holistic Select’s parent company, WellPet, no longer has any ties to Diamond. However, Holistic Select has still received customer complaints of gas and loose stool in pets.Innova: Bought by P&GMerrick: History of recalls
Nature’s Recipe: Manufactured by Del Monte
Nature’s Variety: Many recent recalls
Newman’s Own Organics: Some products made in Uruguay
Nulo: Not enough information
Nutrisca: Contains ingredients from China
Pioneer Naturals: Not enough information
Premium Edge: Too many recalls
Purina® Beneful: Offers minimal nutritional value
Purina® Beneful: Offers minimal nutritional value
Solid Gold: Customer complaints of packaging and ingredient changes
Taste of the Wild: Manufactured by Diamond
Tiki Dog: Manufactured in Thailand
Vital Essentials: Not enough information
Wellness: Was associated with Diamond’s 2012 massive recall, but has since cut ties with Diamond.
Weruva: Some of their products are made in Thailand.
Wild Calling: Food is manufactured and packed by Evanger’s.
"Non Premium Dog Brands": ALL the cheaper brands
"Non Premium Dog Brands": ALL the cheaper brands
Our Stance On Recalls
We understand our methodology isn’t perfect, and we continue to evaluate it each day, especially when it comes to recalls. We took a hard stance on not including brands that had a history of multiple recalls.
Though recalls happen, not all companies respond as swiftly, carefully, and transparently as we’d like. Which means that even after a problem is corrected, they may continue to cut corners, which could lead to future safety concerns.
So while a recall in and of itself isn’t necessarily the last straw for a dog food company, a slow or sloppy response is.
In our research, we didn’t initially look at recall response, but we’re adjusting our judgments on a case-by-case basis.
That doesn’t mean the products from these brands are worse than the products from brands on our recommended list.
Many of these products pass all of our tests when it comes to assessing quality ingredients.
Some of the recalls were created proactively by the brands themselves, meaning there were no incidents reported. Still, we had to draw the line somewhere, but we plan to continue to modify and improve our methodology over time.
On that note, we also removed any and all products that had previously been associated with Diamond brand dog foods.
Diamond pet foods have a history of recalls, including one extremely large and dangerous incident in 2012, which impacted many of its smaller labels.
Diamond pet foods have a history of recalls, including one extremely large and dangerous incident in 2012, which impacted many of its smaller labels.
Dog foods that appear to be of higher quality, like Taste of the Wild, Canidae, and Solid Gold, were all involved at the time, though many consumers were unaware that these particular labels were associated, and several brands have since separated from Diamond and its manufacturers.
We did not feel that Diamond was transparent or diligent enough in its response to meet our criteria.
For this reason, we initially excluded dog foods that were owned or manufactured in Diamond’s factories, because we just could not assure their ongoing safety.
However, we are reconsidering those brands that have severed ties and found new manufacturing locations on a case-by-case basis, based on the visible work the brand has demonstrated.
We’ll continue to consider these brands moving forward, but maintain our hard stance on recalls.
Source: Reviews.com
Don't miss these related articles:
Don't miss these related articles:
- "Dirty Little Lies" Exposed About The Pet Food Industry
- What's Really in Pet Food? The Top 12 Ingredients to Avoid and What Company's Use Them
- The10 Best Dog Food Brands
- 4 Top Tips On Making Homemade Dog Food from Pets-N-More.